Working to Protect the Arctic
Thursday, November 12th, 2009
Posted by Rachel James
In continuation of our circumpolar work focusing on the impacts of the petroleum industry to the Alaska’s Arctic people and wildlife, I traveled with George Edwardson, president of the Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, to Norway, to work with fishermen and to connect with Norwegian media on Arctic issues.
Hosted by the World Wildlife Fund, Norway, we participated in a conference attended by fishermen and local advocates in Svolvaer, Lofoten, which is located in northern Norway above the Arctic Circle in the Barents Sea. The fishermen are concerned about impacts of seismic testing in their fishing grounds.
While in Oslo, we met with many members of the media, including the indigenous Saami media, to raise the issue of the presence of the Norwegian StatoilHydro’s newly purchased leases in Alaska’s high Arctic Sea, the Chukchi. This area is critical to Inupiat subsistence communities and is critical habitat for bowhead whales, polar bears, ice seals, and walrus. StatoiHydro does not allow petroleum activity in areas of the Barents Sea that are ice-covered due to lack of oil spill clean up technology. However, in February they purchased leases in the Chukchi, which is covered in ice over 9 months of the year.
The Norwegian National media had a great interest in the issue. The Norwegian Broadcasting (NRK) covered the issue and ran several stories. This included a top story on their main evening news, focusing on Norwegian double standards regarding petroleum activity in high Arctic waters.
Posted by Sarah Kagan.
While Congress debated hotly contested energy packages, the Department of Interior was exposed for rampant corruption, drug use and sexual misconduct in a report issued last week. With such high gas prices, Americans deserve real solutions to our energy security problems and honest, trustworthy agencies to implement them. Until the Department of Interior cleans house and reevaluates their entire culture of corruption, Congress should not authorize new drilling plans for the agency to implement.
The Minerals Management Service—the hotbed of the scandal—is in charge of managing our offshore drilling programs. This means that those entrusted with deciding how to use American’s resources were getting drunk at Shell-sponsored golf games or were literally in bed with oil company reps. Our government was cheating on America with Big Oil. Now that they’ve been caught, will things change?
Currently, Big Oil and their government friends are trying to jam through energy packages in Congress that will continue special treatment of oil interests and increase oil companies’ profits—at the expense of the average American citizen and special ecological areas that deserve protection. Senator Bill Nelson from Florida said it best: “The rest of the United States government doesn’t need to jump in bed with” the oil industry. Instead, we need to find real solutions to the current energy crisis.
We already know we can’t drill our way to energy security—even oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens admitted that. A recent national energy poll indicates that 83% of Americans support a plan to end our addiction to oil through investments in clean energy—some 20% more than those who support increased offshore drilling. Furthermore, the costs of drilling outweigh the benefits. According to the Department of Energy, offshore drilling will bring no relief at the pump. So for no economic advantage, Americans are being asked to increase our dependence on polluting and finite fossil fuels and put coastal communities, wildlife and ecosystems at great risk.
We’ve already seen the MMS recklessly sell off over 70 million acres of America’s rapidly changing Arctic waters to Shell and other oil companies—despite clear evidence that doing so will increase global warming, push polar bears closer to extinction and threaten the subsistence lifestyles of Alaska Native communities. Even the MMS’s own Environmental Impact Statement on the Chukchi Sea estimates there is a 40% chance of one or more spills spewing more than 42,000 gallons of oil into Arctic waters. What’s more, the environmental conditions in this icy region preclude even cursory clean-up efforts, and no reliable method exists for cleaning up oil in broken sea ice. Proposals to expand oil and gas exploration pose unacceptable risks to a system that is already badly stressed by global warming. They will also perpetuate our addiction to fossil fuels while further worsening the impact of climate change.
Instead, we need energy plans that will actually make a difference. A serious national commitment to renewable energy will put our economy back on the path to prosperity by bringing energy costs under control, creating over 820,000 new jobs, and making us more energy independent. The honest answer to our oil problem is to use less of it, and that means better fuel economy and a shift toward renewable energy. Instead of the failed policies of the past, it’s time to break our addiction to fossil fuels by shifting our priorities—and our policies—toward clean energy sources like wind and solar power and efficiency measures.
We shouldn’t have to watch MMS’s walk of shame. Congress needs to take a stand. They plan to hold hearings in response to this report; they should also stop any new drilling plans. Its time for government to break-up with Big Oil and push forward real energy solutions that actually help Americans and increase our energy security.
Posted by Rachel James and Leah Zimmerman.
On the morning of September 7, 2008, Exxon and Sakhalin Energy prepared to face off in a much-anticipated soccer match to celebrate Oil Workers’ Day. Meanwhile, we (Rachel and Leah, two Pacific Environment staffers) packed a vehicle and headed north on the island with two staffers from Sakhalin Environment Watch, including Dmitry Lisitsyn, a superstar of the Russian Far East environmental movement. We traveled with Dmitry and Katya for three days along the Sakhalin-II pipeline route, a several hundred mile gash running the length of the otherwise wild island.
Dmitry’s questions are relentless. Whether addressing us, shopkeepers on the side of the road, or construction workers on the pipeline route, Dmitry is able to disarm and charm, while extracting critical information with measured precision. For us, time with Dmitry is a lesson in the art of community organizing as well as a lesson about Sakhalin-II itself.
We are struck time and time again by similarities between Shell’s activities on Sakhalin Island and the company’s current strategies in the Alaskan Arctic. Shell could easily write a textbook on how to break promises, give and take bribes, buy off scientists, employ divide and conquer tactics with local opposition, and emasculate environmental assessment processes.
Sakhalin Island was once a prison destination. Today, oil and gas pipeline infrastructure crisscross the island and inflation from the flux of oil executives and construction works has seriously changed the capital city, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. A two-room apartment goes for an exorbitant $1600/month, food prices are among the highest in Russia, and luxury SUVs can be counted by the dozens. While oil executives enjoy a luxurious lifestyle on Sakhalin, Sakhaliners bear the brunt of the grossly inflated costs for food and housing in addition to the devastating environmental, social and economic damage Sakhalin-II brought.
Now that construction of Sakhalin-II is nearing completion, Sakhalin Environment Watch predicts its next great battle will be poaching. We saw first-hand this week how Sakhalin’s rivers, like many on Kamchatka, are being raped by poachers who operate without fear of punishment from disempowered or corrupt government agencies. Imagine thousands of salmon returning to spawn in the river where they were born after years at sea. Now imagine a net stretched across the entire mouth of the river, preventing only a handful of fierce jumpers from among the thousands to return upstream to spawn. After a few years of this, we don’t understand why people are surprised that there are no fish left in the rivers. And so, Dmitry and SEW plot their next move …
| Posted by David Gordon | ||
This week, our staff worked up and down the West Coast of North America to wean the United States off of our addiction to fossil fuels. In Oregon, Rory Cox and Sarah Kagan helped organize a rally in Salem protesting new proposed Liquefied Natural Gas terminals. Proposals to build new terminals in Coos Bay and along the Columbia River would turn Oregon into an energy colony to feed gas to the California market. Remember the old slogan “Don’t Californicate Oregon”? Well, these LNG terminals would do just that. So Rory and Sarah worked with our partners in Oregon to rally on the capitol steps in Salem, bringing over 200 people together to voice their opposition to these polluting and unnecessary terminals. Why would Oregon want to derail its renewable energy initiatives just to feed LNG, a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, to California? Click here to read more about the protest and see photos as well as a video clip! At the same time, up in Alaska, our nation’s Minerals Management Service was busy leasing off vast areas of the Chukchi Sea in the Arctic to oil and gas companies. Shell was the high bidder, with ConocoPhillips and Statoil not far behind. Last week, we filed a lawsuit challenging the sale. At the lease sale itself, Alaska Program Associate Rachel James and Program Fellow Rebecca Noblin worked with Alaska Natives from the Arctic to make sure that their protests were heard by the media. Rebecca even donned a polar bear suit to draw attention to the threats to the polar bears from drilling in the “Polar Bear Seas” and from increased greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the massive amount of proposed drilling. Click here to read a live blog from the event hosted by our friends and colleagues at Alaska Wilderness League and see photos. And click here to read a great opinion piece by our long-term partner Rick Steiner that describes the insanity of the Chukchi lease sale. Let’s hope we can take Rick’s words to heart and break our fossil fuel addiction in North America. We need to do this – to protect our planet from global warming and oil spills as well as to build a new green economy. That’s what our staff was doing all this week, up and down the West Coast! |
| Posted by David Gordon | ||
The government’s decision to delay listing the polar bear as threatened is certainly getting a lot of press – and thankfully, the press is linking the polar bear to the government’s incomprehensible decision to move forward with oil and gas lease sales in the Chukchi Sea. Check out the following links for some great editorials on the subject: Regulatory Games and the Polar Bear (The New York Times) Polar Bears: Stop Oil, Gas Leases (Seattle Post-Intelligencer) Protecting Polar Bears (The Los Angeles Times) The Threatened Polar Bear (The Washington Post) Meanwhile, Congressman Ed Markey is holding a hearing about the polar bear and the Chukchi Lease Sale in the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. The hearing is at 9:30 Eastern Standard Time on Thursday, January 17. The panel will be broadcast over the internet for those interested: It can be accessed by going tohttp://globalwarming.house.gov/home and clicking on the box next to the picture of Ed Markey on the left hand side. The box reads “Next Hearing–Polar Bears on Thin Ice- Thurs. Jan. 17 at 9:30am” If anyone has trouble with that link they can also try here. Let’s hope that Minerals Management Service is paying attention and chooses to delay the Chukchi Lease Sales! |
| Posted by David Gordon | ||
Welcome back to Pacific Environment’s blog in 2008. Over the next year, check back to this blog to find interesting tidbits and news related to our work to protect the Pacific Rim environment! A couple of items caught my eye in the last couple of days. First of all, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delayed its decision about whether to list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act. Supposedly the delay is to allow the Service to consider new scientific studies. Yet the studies – which demonstrate sea ice in the Arctic receding even more rapidly than originally thought – only confirm the critical need to act now. The Fish and Wildlife Service’s delay in making a decision now allows the Minerals Management Service to proceed unhindered with a proposed oil and gas lease sale in the Chukchi Sea in February. Recent news articles suggest that both Exxon and Shell are interested in the lease sale. Is it coincidence that the Fish and Wildlife Service’s delay allows the government to move forward with this lease, which will only increase the threats to the polar bears? I think not. Click here to read a press release from our partners at Center for Biological Diversity or click here for an article that explains the connection between the polar bear delay and the Chukchi lease sale. We fiddle while the Arctic burns. Meanwhile, at least South Korea is taking some action. Click here to learn that South Korea is taking action to ban single-hulled tankers by 2010, following its disastrous oil spill last month. Wait, you say, weren’t single-hulled tankers banned after the Exxon Valdez? No, unfortunately not. The Valdez spill led to an international agreement to phase out single-hulled tankers by 2015. Now, South Korea is making a commitment to moving up that timeline. Sometimes it takes an accident like they experienced to force action. We could learn something from Korea. |
| Posted by David Gordon |
|
This is the time of year when many people think about charitable giving and how to create positive change for the year ahead. If you like what you have been reading on this blog, I would encourage you to donate to Pacific Environment. On this blog, you’ve read just a few of the stories about our on-the-ground work around the Pacific Rim and why our staff are so effective at dealing with the huge environmental challenges that our world faces today. We’ve had a great year, with victories in China, Russia, Alaska, and California. Your support will help us achieve even more great results around the Pacific Rim in 2008! Just click here if you would like to support us with a year-end, tax-deductible donation. Thank you for your support, and thank you for all that you do to make this world a better place! From all of us here at Pacific Environment, best wishes for the holidays and New Year! Here’s to a great 2008! Happy Holidays, David Gordon |
| Posted by David Gordon |
|
This morning, we woke up to news about another major Pacific Rim oil spill. This time, it appears as though a barge with a crane struck an oil tanker off the coast of South Korea in the Yellow Sea, spilling over 10,000 tons of oil. This is the third major oil spill we have seen in a month – in San Francisco Bay, in the Black Sea, and now in the Yellow Sea. Time will tell how bad the damage will be from this latest spill, though given the amount of oil spilled, and the likelihood that less than 20% of the oil will be recovered, we can expect the impacts to be severe. Earlier this year, I attended an oil spill workshop in Japan and met colleagues in Korea working to prevent oil spills. They were particularly worried about the growth in shipping of oil – symbolized by new tankers coming from Sakhalin along the coast of Korea – and the likelihood of accidents. Up until then, their worst catastrophe had been the Sea Prince spill in 1995. Today’s spill involves twice as much oil as the Sea Prince. Here’s an article that details the fact that this was a single-hulled tanker – a dinosaur that long ago should have been retired in favor of double-hulled tankers. This area in the Yellow Sea is a very busy region for shipping. Given growth of shipping around the Pacific Rim, I hope this will be a wake-up call for the International Maritime Organization and governments to address the dire need to improve shipping safety. Meanwhile, here in San Francisco Bay, more details are coming out about the bar pilot’s mishandling of the Cosco Busan, leading to our spill. It seems clear that the pilot made numerous mistakes that led to the spill, including leaving port in such heavy fog without electronic equipment that either was working properly or that he understood and ordering the ship to full speed in heavy fog when he didn’t understand his location. A terrible, preventable tragedy. We need legislative action in Congress to make sure that such accidents around the Pacific Rim are prevented in the future. |
| Posted by David Gordon | ||
Today brought yet another of the myriad of articles reporting record melting of sea ice in the Arctic: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/09/21/MNMISACP7.DTL The Arctic, the air conditioner for the earth, is melting. So far, what’s the response? Let’s explore for more oil and gas in the Arctic. Russia is laying claim to a large portion of the Arctic: http://uk.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUKL2082113920070920, primarily for oil and gas development. Or check out this map, which shows proposed and existing oil and gas leases in the Arctic, Bering Sea, and the Sea of Okhotsk, along with Russia’s territorial claims. Looks like we’re zoning the Arctic for oil and gas. Ironic, isn’t it? There are winners and losers in climate change, and the large oil companies will try to be winners. I think a smarter way to go would be to push for an Arctic treaty to help protect the Arctic as we deal with climate change. |