Home   »  Blog

Archive for the ‘Capacity-Building’ Category

Convening in China – Annual Water Pollution Conference

Friday, October 10th, 2008
2008 Water Pollution Conference Participants

2008 Water Pollution Conference Participants

Posted by Daniela Salaverry

Gansu, China — Zhang Yadong is furiously taking notes. This is his first Water Pollution Network Conference, and his goal for participating is to learn. Zhang recently graduated and has assumed the leadership role of his organization Green Longjiang in Harbin.

“I’m just starting off in this position,” Zhang says, “I want to learn from Zhao Zhong and Zhou Xiang during this conference. I want to get a sense of how to develop my programs so I have some direction when I go back to Harbin.”

Zhang and 20 other grassroots environmental leaders and Pacific Environment partners have gathered in Gansu Province in western China for our fourth annual water pollution network conference.  Our local host in Gansu is Green Camel Bell (GCB), Gansu’s first independent environmental NGO. As we all meet in GCB’s office for our first evening of discussion and introductions, people are tired from their travels but excited. The energy is palpable, and people are eager to share ideas, learn from each other and build partnerships.

On the second day, we travel from the city of Lanzhou, to the countryside town of Liujia Xia. On the outskirts of town Ran Li Ping, GCB’s project coordinator points out some of the heavy-industry. I realize that the blue sky had suddenly turned into a thick haze as we drove through this industrial zone. The change was dramatic, and a visible way to remember the big pollution challenge these groups, and China as a whole, are dealing with.

We stop again another hour down the road in a small village where GCB is doing outreach on water quality issues. This village had a water pump and filter built over a decade ago, but high silt levels caused the pumping facility to stop working only days after it began operating, and the door has been locked ever since. Green Camel Bell is working with this town to figure out the best ways they can get clean water, and earlier this year they donated a water filtration system to the town’s clinic.

When we returned we dove into two days of discussions on water pollution campaign strategies, program updates, and ideas for future collaboration and partnership. Water Pollution Network partners presented on their program work: Green Anhui discussed their success in helping to close a local factory; Green Oasis presented on their collaboration with Ma Jun; Green Camel Bell discussed their partnership with a local enterprise that makes water filtration products. Pacific Environment staff facilitated conversations on campaign strategy development and how we want to strengthen our partnerships with the members of this network.

After two days of on-going discussions and information, we’re all simultaneously exhausted and rejuvenated. The forward thinking of these groups, as they sit on the brink of growth and change, is inspiring.

China’s New Generation of Leaders

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008
In an exchange, our partners from China met with US NGOs to learn about their work.

In an exchange, our partners from China met with US NGOs to learn about their work.

Posted by Xiu Min Li

Today I met one of the NGOs we work with in China – Green Student Forum. It is the foremost student environmental organization that is comprised of student groups across Beijing and the country. GSF is characterized by the discipline and enthusiasm of China’s new generation of leaders.

GSF’s office was located in one of Beijing’s tens and thousands of residential complexes, like most NGOs. When I arrived I was met by a student volunteer, Zhang Xiangui, the coordinator of the water project, and six other students. They were eager and shy. They shook my hand heavily and looked away as soon as I caught their eyes. I was sent to sit in the best chair in the midst of a room of tiny wooden stools.

These students came from the four teams of university volunteers who were assigned different sections of the Long River. They were responsible for organizing student volunteers from their own school to do a survey of the river, compile information about the history and important sites in the area, and interview neighborhoods along the river about their concerns. The end result would be a Green Map of Beijing’s Rivers. The plan was to include facts on the river and a conservation guide on the back of the map. This map would be distributed through various public events in schools and neighborhoods. They would also contact the Tourism bureau to see if they would be interested in distributing the map.

About eleven students and I went to do a field trip to the Long River. We went to Jishuitan, one of the subway stops I was most familiar with as it was nearest to my house when I lived in Beijing almost 7 years ago. It was still familiar but visibly renovated. A giant new bike tent was created with rows of racks two levels high. Across from the station is a shining new shopping center. The Military Theatre next door had a complete face lift. It used to be an aging building with a stale facade and a dusty ticketing booth that was always closed. Now it’s an artsy glass structure with spiky steel bars rising to the sky and a digital display of its current shows.  The sidewalks have all been fixed up and along the river that run through the area, it was landscaped with plants and trees along stone walls with carvings of calligraphies and were equipped with viewing platforms dotted with people fishing, couples cuddling and old people idling. A student from Beijing Normal University met up with us and served as local guide.

The students were pleased with the makeover but skeptical it would be kept up with after the Olympics. A decorated fountain was pumping up clear water that quickly merged into the deep green river too muddled to see through more than two inches deep. Occasionally there were tiny black fishes that swam right beneath the surface and they would be met with utmost enthusiasm by the students. I asked if people fishing here would actually eat them, they laughed. They fish for pleasure and always released them back in. The fish are not edible – some fish can grow even in the most polluted rivers.
We walked along the river on a stone path. There was a long patch that ran next to residential buildings and offices. It was a mile long path with no exit in between. All the entrances were sealed off with medal locks reinforced with medal fences. We just walked and walked and walked. Every section of the river was heavily maintained, either through careful landscaping or heavily secured fences. But clearly no one was keeping it sanitized because the path was dotted with spotty feces and trash that the students called bombs.

Our last stop was the reality part of the tour of the river. We arrived at a section populated by the “floating population” as the students called them – migrants who came to seek jobs and managed to stay within the city as opposed to being out on the 4th ring road on the outskirt of no man’s land. We immediately came upon foul odors as we entered a narrow alley leading to a settlement. Amongst dilapidated houses there was a hair salon and a restaurant. Three teenage girls with various styles of colored and spiky hair were lounging around in shorts and fixing their nails inside the salon where there was clearly no business.

After dinner, we returned to the office for the report and their plan for next year. Inspired by Fei’s visit to the US with the Green Corp, GSF wants to implement similar program in China. Through their experience working with other environmental NGOs, they feel that many NGOs’ main obstacle is lacking good leadership/organizers. They would like to establish a training program specifically to address that. The training would include team building, project management, technical understanding of environmental issues and other basic skills like material developments. Approximately five participants would be trained on this issue while taking on a community based project. They would then be dispatched to other established NGOs as interns during the summer to gain hands’ on experience in all the elements they had been trained on.

As I looked around the room, most students including Fei and Zhang were not from Beijing, with many from the countryside which desperately needed attention to their most basic environmental needs. From the perspective of building a widespread environmental movement across China, I felt that it was important to have an element in their training that involves students doing a small project to fix a small problem facing their own home town/village. They agreed that this would be appropriate at a more advance stage of their training, once they’ve been trained of all the elements of doing a project and gotten experience working with a successful NGO seeing how a project plays out in real life, it would then be a logical step to bring their new found knowledge to make a difference in their hometown.

Forcing the Russian NGO Movement Out in the Cold

Thursday, December 8th, 2005

The Russian Duma is considering new legislation that would restrict the activity of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The Duma wants to force all of Russia’s 450,000 NGOs to re-register, which will be nothing more than a bureaucratic mess. As pointed out in Kathleen Braden’s wonderful op-ed in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (click here), this won’t be a problem for the big, national, well-funded NGOs. But it will be disastrous for the local community-based groups, spread out through Siberia and the Russian Far East, who will be dependent on the Oblomov-like whims of local bureaucrats for their success in re-registering. Many new people who want to make a difference will be scared away from becoming NGO activists. And some ofRussia’s brightest lights – people who are truly working toward sustainable and positive change in the society – will end up without support.

Supposedly, the Russian government wants to prevent foreign funding of political campaigns. I don’t have a problem with this. We have restrictions in the U.S. that prevent Pacific Environment, as a 501c3 charitable organization, from endorsing political candidates or spending more than a modest amount of our time and resources to lobby for legislation.However, these restrictions should be as minimal as possible to protect a free and open discourse. There are no restrictions here on our ability to raise concerns about administrative officials or administrative policies or to publicize issues, even if they are controversial. But inRussia, some pundits are saying that a ban on political activity should include a ban on working with the media to publicize issues or a ban on raising concerns about actions by governors or other administrative officials.

This would be ridiculous. Russian NGOs have played a fundamentally important role over the last decade in helping to promote rule of law within Russia. In the environmental sphere, they have helped ensure Russia’s Law on the Protection of the Environment and Law on Environmental Impact Reviews have been implemented. They have prevented capricious actions by local officials and companies when they did not follow a fair process of due diligence in reviewing industrial projects. Most of all, they have steadfastly argued for regular, engaged public participation to ensure that communities have a say in their environmental future. A recent article from Dow Jones highlights the role our partners at Sakhalin Environment Watch play in helping local government officials, who don’t have the resources to monitor large oil and gas companies like Shell and Exxon. In the article, Sergei Kotelnikov, Sakhalin’s head environmental regulator, said that “he relies heavily on information passed to his staff by local environmental groups such as Green Patrol and Sakhalin Environment Watch.” 

As we wait for the pollution from Harbin to flow down the Amur River to Khabarovsk, and indigenous communities who live along the Amur worry about eating fish, don’t we want communities to have a voice in ensuring that they have access to clean water? What will happen if communities don’t have the ability to organize as professional NGOs and engage the government and the private sector in a healthy and open dialogue about the future, and instead problems are allowed to fester?

I hope that President Putin and the Duma will re-consider this proposed law. Meanwhile, inRussia’s increasingly hostile climate, I think it becomes even more important for organizations like our own to maintain and strengthen our partnerships with groups in Siberia and the Russian Far East who are working to create positive change in the society.

Cheers,

David Gordon

Feature Events
Blog
Gallery
Links